Skip to main content

60 Days on the Estates review – how to make a great show about social housing? Don’t involve Tory MPs

This look at life on two inner-city estates is a gentle, sincere take that sees survivalist Ed Stafford spend three weeks living there. It’s a far cry from the patronising work of Michael Portillo et al

I hadn’t realised how traumatised I remain by Michael Portillo. Not so much the trousers and jackets sported on his train travel, although they remain borderline criminal, but his efforts to engage with The Poor. First in 1993, when he emulated the lifestyle of a single mother on benefits (“For someone like me, who’s never had to think about these things, it’s just boring having to think all the time about how you buy the cheapest things and whether the money’s going to last”). And then again – because those poor and their boring lives are always with us, are they not? – five years ago he gave us a feature-length documentary in which he oozed around the council estates of England in Our Housing Crisis: Who’s to Blame? If memory serves, the answer somehow wasn’t Margaret Thatcher’s reign-defining sell-off of the public housing stock (we had 6.5m council homes in 1980; nearly a third of them were transferred to private hands under the Right to Buy scheme). Instead, it was apparently the failure of councils to build replacements since. Obvious, really, especially if you are a devotee of oleaginous logic delivered with a smug but straight face.

But it all comes flooding back. As do awful memories of Matthew Parris attempting to live on benefits for a week in 1983. He considered the people he met, living “meagre and threadbare” lives, were at the right level of poverty to stay motivated, and returned 20 years later to find how things had turned out. Fortunately, in 60 Days on the Estates, Ed Stafford – who spends three weeks on a London estate then three weeks on its Brummie equivalent in next week’s episode – might be another middle-aged, middle-class white man, but he is not a Tory MP. This, it turns out, makes quite the difference.

Continue reading...

from The Guardian https://ift.tt/XI0Yw1t

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Guardian view on Covid-19, five years on: lessons still to be learned | Editorial

Though many would rather forget the pandemic, we are living with its consequences. Are we any better prepared for the next one? “When asked what was the biggest disaster of the twentieth century, almost nobody answers the Spanish flu,” notes Laura Spinney in her book Pale Rider, of an event that killed as many as one in 20 of the global population. “There is no cenotaph, no monument in London, Moscow or Washington DC.” Most of us will better understand that absence after Covid-19 , which was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization five years ago this week. Some cannot put those events behind them: most obviously, many of those bereaved by the 7 million deaths worldwide (not including those indirectly caused by the pandemic ), and the significant numbers still living with long Covid . Others want to forget the loss of loved ones, the months of isolation and the costs to businesses, families and mental health. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? I...